Non-pathological skin conditions associated with a dysbiosis
Changes in the skin microbiota can also be seen in non-pathological skin conditions. The skin is constantly exposed to various endogenous, exogenous and lifestyle factors that can affect the physical, mechanical or microbial properties of the skin barrier.19
Lay public section
Find here your dedicated section
Nappy rash. Close-up of perianal dermatitis in a 1 month old female patient, showing red and inflamed skins.
About this article
Created
22 April 2021
Updated
22 July 2024
Discomfort, irritation, diaper rash
Sensitive skin “tightens”, tingles or burns in response to stimuli that would not normally cause such sensations. It is seen both in people with normal skin and in those with a disruption of the skin barrier.19 A hyperreactive cutaneous nervous system, the skin barrier and the skin microbiota are thought to be involved.19 An alteration of the stratum corneum in sensitive subjects may contribute to penetration by chemical, environmental and microbial agents associated with increased skin sensitivity.19
Diaper rash only affects skin exposed to diaper friction, excessive hydration and a variable pH, and in constant contact with urine and feces. Candida albicans and Staphylococcus aureus are potentially involved.20
Image
Wound healing
As a result of the physical tear of skin tissue, the wound healing process begins with inflammation that results from close cooperation between immune cells and bacteria involved in the process.21 Commensal bacteria such as Staphylococcus, Streptococcus, Pseudomonas and Corynebacterium have both positive and negative effects on wound healing. They stimulate the host immune system and reduce invasion by other pathogenic microorganisms, but this loss of microbial diversity is often accompanied by prolonged inflammation, which may slow wound healing.21
This close relationship between host and skin microbiota in wound healing processes could open the door to novel therapies, such as creams rich in antimicrobial peptides, biofilm-destroying probiotics or anti-inflammatory bacteria.12,21
Body odor
Human body odors result from the metabolization by bacteria of sweat components (amino acids, fatty acids and glycerols), leading to the production of malodorous molecules, e.g. the “sulfurous” or “sour” odor of acetic acid produced by Staphylococcus spp. in children and adolescents, or the “sour” odor of thiols produced by Corynebacterium and Staphylococcus spp. in adults.7 The repeated use of deodorants and antiperspirants alters bacterial diversity in the armpit, favoring staphylococci over Corynebacterium, which may have counterproductive effects in adolescents.7
Expert opinion
Could probiotics be a third option for dealing with body odors, in addition to the two classical strategies, alcohol-based deodorants and antiperspirants?
"I think it’s possible that the regular, long-term application of a body odor product containing live microorganisms could change the microbiota of the armpit so that it’s less prone to producing odors. However, I suspect this would have a very mild effect and would probably be less effective than the antimicrobial effect of alcohol. Also, probiotics would not be able to prevent underarm dampness (sweat production) with the same effectiveness as the aluminum chlorohydrate that blocks sweat pores in antiperspirants."
Sources
